Thats a good question eh Chief Constable. When will the discrimination end?
The DLA was refused me, the Decision to Set aside that Decision was refused, with the 'Findings on Questions of Fact Material to Determination' discribed as and I quote 'there was not a document relevant to the proceedings in which the decision was given which was either not sent to or received by a party to the proceedings at an appropriate time'.
Funny how I asked for all my blogs to be read, but that was not done see the previous blog relating to that. There was no computor access at the proceedings although that also was requested prior to the appointment. There appear to be no investigation as to the Cardiff County Council employee who assisted me in filling out the claim form initially, who told me during that meeting that he would accompany me to the tribunal. and who later washed his hands of me, why was I mislead??????? anyone have an answer to that Crazydave.
Or that this DLA doctor has kept her trap shut regarding the complaints of wilful neglect by the Health Minister a fellow GP? and well as the other issues surrounding the Wilful neglect of Vulnerable Adults which you Chief Constable conspire in, by never ever doing anything as far as I am aware to address the issues.
but I imagine these panel members receive a nice wedge for their attendance of that meeting, aren't they supposed to investigate claims of abuse made by clients, it doesn't seem like from this latest decision, rather like you they partake in the abuse by their do nothing, couldn't care less attitude.
In fact thye final quip from the doctor, was that I did not meet the physical incapacity grounds necessary to entitle me to mobility allowance, even though other mental health sufferes are in receipt of the mobility allowance part of DLA which I pointed out during the meeting and questioned in the previous blog, regarding some other clients I have come accross in my life.
Here then is the appeal letter, just to put it in the public domain
Mrs M L Smith
Clerk to the Tribunal
Thurs 14/3/07
Hi Mrs smith
In reply to your 7/3/07 letter, that the decision not be set aside.
This then is the Appeal letter from me to your dept. The grounds are ‘discrimination against mental health sufferers’ who deserve the boom of mobility as much as the physically disabled.
I could take the time to disagree with M T A Curran’s reasons for Determination but that would be a waste of my time however I will attach a copy of my form sent back to the Tribunal where it requests that they read all the blogs as well as have a computer terminal prior to the meeting. That request the chairman is either not aware of or has chosen to ignore, was never acted upon.
Also he ignores the claims of wilful neglect and victimization by the welsh assembly and Cardiff county council. It appears that the Dr. at the meeting has chosen not to follow up those complaints, and therefore is party to them, or else I would be hearing that Dr. Brian Gibbon had been arrested under caution by South Wales Police. Need I say more????????????????????
All the Best David Gabriel
I may have the date wrong for the thursday but the rest I trust will be cause to ask some very serious questions about the manner in which these professionals get their buisness done. Eh Chief Constable?
It would seem that they live quite well off their turn up to these meeting and those they are supposed to aid can go swanny, yet they would like to think of themselves as Good Citizens. Ha!
UPDATE WEDS 25/4/07
here as a couple of letters that I have had to send since posting this blog, I wonder if you can guess what the Tibunal Service letters were, cos I am not typing those out.
To Sian Rees
Regional Manager
Tribunals service
Thurs 29/3/07
HI Sian
This letter is in response to Mrs S Thompson letter to me from your organisation dated 28/3/07. while I find it odd that I hand delivered the letter on the 15/3/07 she claims it was received in your office on the 20/3/07, maybe I should have got a receipt after all.
In her next paragraph she goes on to inform me that I will have to appeal to the Commissioners and specify the error in Law made. She fails to tell me who the Commissioners are or where they may be contacted for one thing for the other, I am amazed that if your department is incapable of dealing with the complaint why you have not forwarded it to the Commissioners yourself????????????
I would like to make a freedom of information request since my appeal is regarding the discrimination of certain clients by your department all suppositions made on behalf of mental health clients by a Mr. Paul Kempton an employee of Cardiff county Council you may blank out the names of the clients he represented in order that their privacy not be violated.
I ask this, in order for me to further press my claim to the Commissioners, regarding the discrimination that has gone on with my claim, and to counter the assertion by the doctor on the panel that the mobility section of DLA is for the physically disabled only.
Alternatively you may choose as the Executive Officer for the area to over ride the judgement of Mrs S Thompson in this case and grant the mobility section of the claim at the £68 pw week figure mentioned during the chat with the panel.
I would hope that you choose the latter, however based on the discrimination I have received previously by government departments to numerous to mention here. I do not believe you will be allowed to do that.
Yours David Gabriel
To Sian Rees
Regional manager
Tribunal Service
12/4/07
Hi Sian
In reply to your office letter dated the 4/4/07 in reply to my 29/3/07 a very prompt reply if I may say so. It informs me that the freedom of information request of that letter is being processed, but unfortunately fails to let me know that the request that the appeal be forwarded to These Commissioners is being done also.
This letter is just to ask if that is being done your end, to ask you why it was not done in the begging and to also inquire as to why it was not mentioned in this last from your office.
If by any chance your still on leave. Could who ever deals with it also send me stuff that you undoubtedly have on who these commissioners are and what they do and where their housed, and we can leave the reasons for the not doing till when you return???????
Yours David Gabriel
Sian Rees
Regional Manager
Tribunal Service
Fri 20/4/07
Hi Sian
This is in reply to your office last to me outlining the role of the commissioners, unfortunately it did not contain their address or their email.
I trust that you can rectify that asap as I believe your chairman has had more than ample time to come to a decision and given my past experience its unlikely to be different than that of your panel.
The ones where vulnerable adults can complain of negligence, wilful neglect and victimization and they do nothing, one of them a supposed GP.
But then what’s new. Have you looked at the nuisance neighbour video on http://bbccrazydave.blogspot.com/ well I have had him doing more of his tearing stuff off his side of the divide and chucking it in my garden, because the police do nothing because my MP has done nothing because uncle tom cobbly un all have done nothing.
I trust they are all satisfied with themselves, as no doubt you all are with yours.
David Gabriel
Well I am waiting on the reply to that one. Sian's been delegating the replies to other's which is fine but you think that it would be the same other's wouldn't you for continuity reasons.
update weds 23/5/07 oh wot a wicked web they weave eh crazydave. HERE then are some more emails, can you get the drift here.
Subject: CONFIRMATION REQUEST FOR A STATEMENT OF REASONS To Sian Rees
Regional Manager
weds.9/5/07
Hi sian
today I have spoken to one of your staff a John Walker, who I miss took to say his name was Ken. It would seem that I havent made a request for a statement of reasons and that I will somehow have to explain why this has occurred in order for my APPEAL to go forward.
I wonder given the copies of the letters that have been copy pasted to blogger the commissioners will ask what I am asking is how come someone who has made a request for an appeal who frankly doesn't not understand the process, hasn't had that particular document sent to him as a matter of course following the stated intention of wishing to APPEAL.
You and your co workers understand this draw out rigmarole of an appeal process it seems for your own benefit and I would have assumed that given your client base, some of whom like myself have no help from any quarter, don't have such an ease of process application.
That's some reasons for me applying to the commissioners today, rather than wait for yet more delaying tactics from your dept.
Now I will not be forwarding a copy of this via letter, and I trust that that does not delay this process any more. On matters of or points of law sufficient, deliberately missleading or shall we say delaying the progress might be considered in certain circumstances a criminal act. Least of all the claim of discrimination of mental health sufferes in claiming DLA.
yours David Gabriel NI number given.
I also sent a copy to the commissioners with the following questions
to the osscsc commissioners osscsc@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk
Hi there
below is an email sent today to the following email address JP.Walker@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk I am hoping that its a real address following my phone call with Mr. Walker. Why am I writing this to you, well its in the hope that we can all cut to the chase in my appeal and I will not have to go through the rigmarole that these people in cardiff wish me to.
I would like someone at the commissioners office to have a look at a series of blogs that I have placed on blogger at http://bbccrazydave.blogspot.com I trust that person will read the DLA blog where the letters I have sent regarding this appeal have been posted and I would ask the commissioner given the client base, how come this statement of resaons wasn't just sent out, so that we could all move onto the next phase.
Really I would like the commissioner to investigate the goings on at cardiff with regard this matter and the questions that my blogs raise, not least of which is that I have made claims of abuse at the Tribunal hearing that a GP on that panel has totally ignored.
To the detriment of my health and welfare. I do trust that someone will get back to me on this asap, and that they like me consider this process totally insane, given their client group.
yours david gabriel replies by email are always preferred and hence I am not supplying my address.
To Sian Rees
Regional Manager
weds.9/5/07
Subject: Further to my appeal email 9/5/07
Please forward to Sian Rees
Regional Manager tribunal Service
Tues 14/5/07
Hi Sian
In reply to your 8/5/07 received by me 11/5/07 that crossed my 9/5/07 email which would be nice if you had an auto responder so that I know its been received. I don't have your email address hopefully all correspondence in the near future will have that added to your stationary?
I notice that you fail to mention in your letter that in the first month I applied for the Decision to be Set Aside. Regarding this 'statement of reasons' I believe that was supplied with the Decision Notice.
Or that following the failure of the Decision to be set aside that I provided enough statement of reasons with 'Discrimination against mental health sufferes to the boon of mobility' or that in the 15/3/07 letter 'the refusal of the panel to act on the just claims of wilful neglect and victimization, (see the dla blog on http://bbccrazydave.blogspot.com/ ).
I would add this reason following receipt of this last from you for errors in Law that of 'aiding and abetting criminal negligence with respect to my healthy n welfare.
In s. Thompsons 28/3/07 she titles the letter 'about your DLA Appeal' and for me to specify the error in Law (now what does that mean???) discrimination against mental health suffere's ought to be sufficient for starters.
That leads me to the freedom of information request that I am apparently not allowed the details requested (see the DLA blog) because they are held in a 'court report'
I am left wondering if thats the case how come I havent been offered the use of a solicitor in all this for some legal assistance, or am I missing something here??? (see below a copy of the email chase up of that, and at the time of writing this I have yet to receive a reply).
Now, given that the title of the 28/3/07 letter was 'about your DLA Appeal' Why didn't Mrs Thompson check her records to see if the box for statement of reasons had been sent or not and if not include it in her letter???
so lets add to the 'Errors in Law' the ole 'attempting to pervert the course of justice' with regard to this Appeal proceedure shall we.
What I find remarkable is that while our government can tell me thay are cock a hop that the private rental sector is thriving. Or that the Social Securtiy system is missused to pay one private landlord £3/4 of a million via the housing benefit system in Cardiff. That system is more than vigorous in keeping another in penuary because they cannot function in the working world. but that its ok for that individual to be a conduit of vast wealth to the healthy lets screw the system for all its worth Private Landlord.
Or that our County Council can fiddle their accounts and claim higher than need be rentals due to this fiddle, and noone not but noone take any interest not even the Police. Yet some woman caught doing a cleaning job for 2hrs a day to suppliment an inadiquate income that the state allows then uncle tom cobbley and all are up in arms in richeous indignation braying 'send her to prison me Lud'
There is a £30 million a year fraud going on with Cardiff County Councils Rent Revenue Account that the Social Security Fraud dept are turning a blind eye to and noone has shown me facts or figures to rebut my claim, not the ombudsman not the District Auditor not the fraud squad. do you wonder why Sian???
All that detailed in the blogs your panel refused to look at even though it was requested they do prior to my interview.
So let me ask you Sian and the commissioners have your panel been culpable of 'Criminal Negligence with respect to my health n welfare' by refusing to look at them. Ought I have been granted a Legal Aid solictor if my appointment is now subject to a 'court report' maybe they would be better able to define what an 'error in Law' ruddy well means.
Also given your offices game playing by refusing to send this 'statement of reasons' as a matter of course following my request for an appeal. Also culpable of Criminal Negligence with respect to my health and Welfare???
Does that shed some futher Light o the reason's why I would like the Appeal to go before the commissioners (oh and by the way Mr. Walkers web address for them differed from you own but then you have my or his word to take for that, given the parliamentary ombudsmans collusion with medical services and their perjury of their GP in his report I don't particulary hold out much hope of them coming through in my favour.
I wonder what your vested interest is in all of this Sian or the rest of your dept. is it just bloody mindedness or deliberate cruelty and vindictiveness that is grist to your vainglorious mill.
David Gabriel.
here then is a copy of the chase up the freedom of info request sent 30/4/07
thanks for your letter Stephen stephen.hunt@dca.gsi.gov.uk
I wonder if I word the freedom of information request differently you will be able to provide the information. So here goes.
1) Is it possible that I could have a number of times Paul Kempton has represented mental health clients at the Tribunal Service.
2) out of all these cases how many times was he successful in gaining DLA for said number.
3) which component of DLA was granted in each instance he was successful.
I trust that this is not subject to the restrictions mentioned in your letter.
all the best David.
On the 16/5/07 I received this from the commissioners I'd contacted
From : OSSCSC at Newspaper House
Sent : 16 May 2007 10:39:56
To : "david gabriel"
Subject : RE: confirmation of request for a statement of reasons
Dear Mr Gabriel
Thank you for your email which we received on 10/05/07. I am sorry we cannot process your complaint as we are a different Department. Please contact Cardiff TAS Office or you can log on to the below link for information on complaints procedures.
http://www.appeals-service.gov.uk/what_to_expect/complaints_pro.htm
Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can be of further assistant.
Yours sincerely
Mrs Lata Shah
Following receipt of that email I got hold of these and sent a copy of what I had previously sent on 16/5/07
Subject: fw:re: confirmation request for a statement of reasons
Hi there SSCSA-Cardiff@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk
I've had the reply below from the OSSCSC and I am wondering if you can enlighten me on what I have todo next. There is another email following this one that they have yet to respond to and I will forward that following the sending of this.
David
This sent on the 21/5/07
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribunals.gsi.gov.ukHere then is the other email mentioned in my previous and the email address it was sent to.
Hi there osscsc@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk
below is my email to Sian Rees at Tribunal services Cardiff using this email address JP.Walker@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk in Sian's letter she tells me that the web site I ought to use to contact the commissioners is http://www.ossc.com/ have I sent the 9/5/07 and this therefore to the wrong people???
AFTER RECEIVING YET ANOTHER LETTER ASKING ME TO ASK FOR A RUDDY STATEMENT OF REASONS I SENT THIS TODAY 23/5/07.
To the Chairman of the Tribunals Service
to Sian Rees Regional manager
Hi there
this email is in response to Mark Pickford's 18/5/07 letter to me, no title just this ref 188/06/00204. He tells me that he has looked at my files has read my emails.
In paragraph 3 he writes 'The first step is to make a request, in writing, for a full statement of reasons for the decision.' He also states that I ought to explain in a letter why I did not apply within the one month period (see paragraph 5 of his letter).
On page two para 2 he states 'Please note that anything you wish to say in respect of the request for a statement of reasons or any subsequent application must be sent with that application. Though this may be by way of e-mail, the Tribunal Service will not have regard to blogs or other observations in electronic format which are not enclosed with your application.'
So Chairperson
The reason I have not received this statement of reasons is due to the delaying tactics of the likes of Mr. Pickford, based around game playing with semantics i.e. I would like to appeal the decision versus Can I have a statement of reasons.
That therefore your dept. is at fault for any delay in their taking the next step in the process of my receiving the next part of the documentation for that appeal to be heard. It would seem that the likes of Mr. Pickford can with scant disregard attempt to pervert the course of justice with his missive, and were I some judge presiding over that charge by Mr. Gabriel, Mr. Pickford would be given a conditional discharge and never allowed to work in an environment dealing with mental health sufferes ever again.
I will point out once again the letter dated 28/3/07 mentioned in the previous emails tilted 'regarding your appeal' when this game playing with semantics first started.
Hopefully the judge will ask the same question 'Why didn't she knowing full well that Mr. Gabriel had requested an appeal, send the statement of reasons!' and ask Mr. Pickford the same question when its his turn to answer to the judge to the allegation mentioned above.
A shortened list of emails so far sent regarding this dla application.
JP.Walker@tribunals....
confirmation of request for a statement o...
May 9
6KB
osscsc@tribunals.gsi...
confirmation of request for a statement o...
May 9
11KB
JP.Walker@tribunals....
Further to appeal email 9/5/07
May 15
19KB
osscsc@tribunals.gsi...
Further to appeal email 9/5/07
May 15
21KB
OSSCSC at Newspaper ...
RE: confirmation of request for a stateme...
May 16
22KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
FW: RE: confirmation of request for a sta...
May 16
21KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
Further to appeal email 9/5/07 the 2nd em...
May 16
22KB
SSCSA Cardiff
RE: Further to appeal email 9/5/07 the 2n...
May 21
41KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
RE: Further to appeal email 9/5/07 the 2n...
May 21
42KB
If you check these emails out you will find that the Subject heading is 'confirmation request for a statement of reasons'. But then that seems to have gone ignored by this Mr. Pickford.
Need I say more Chairperson regarding that aspect of my appeal and the reasons for the delay?????
As for the matter regarding the use or not of my blogs I think Mr. Pickford is living in the 20th Century and that blogs and emails are in the 21 century given all due diligence. As I also do not have the financial where withall to print the blogs out but can and will supply a list via email wonder once again about this Tribunal Judiciary that he mentions and ask once again am I entitled to the services of a solicitor regarding these grave matters??? via legal aid.
Yours getting fed up with the Dispite shown by the Tribunal Service employees
david gabriel NI number supplied
NEXT UPDATE SOON NO DOUBT.
UPDATE THURS 31/5/07
WELL HERE ARE TWO LETTERS RECEIVED FOLLOWING THAT EMAIL, SEEMS THAT THEY WILL NOT EMAIL ME SO I WILL HAVE TO RE-TYPE THEM HERE RATHER THAN COPY PASTE THEM FOR EMAIL.
DATE 23/5/07 (recieved by me 26/5/07 incidently)
dEAR mR. GABRIEL
thank you for your latest e-mail dated the 16th May in response to my letter of the 8th may 2007. I understand my colleague Mr. Mark Pickford has written to you on the 18th may in response to the judicial issues you have raised.
In the first part of your letter addressed to osscsc@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk you claim that you were advised that their address was http://www.ossc.com/ in my letter of the 8th may. I have rechecked the correspondence again and can comfirm their address is http://www.ossc.gov.uk/ which was the original address advised to you in my last letter. You have also attempted to contact us using the e-mail address JP.Walker@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk which is an invalid e-mail address. If you wish to e-mail us in future please use the customer services e-mail address which is SSCSA-Cardiff@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk and this will then be forwarded to the relevant person to deal with.
I have raised your concerns regarding the issue of an auto responder being atttached to our customer servioce e-mail address and this has now been implemented.
You mention in your letter that you believed that you would receive a statement of reasons with your decision notice. I am afraid that this is not the case and you will have to apply for this seperately as advised by Mark in his letter of the 18th May.
I have also read your comments in relation to asking the commissioner to investigate the goings on at Cardiff. I am happy to investigate any issue you may have but will only do so if you forward the issues you have directly to me rather than posting them on the internet.
In regards to your freedom of information request that you e-mailed to Stephen Hunt, I have spoken to the Access Rights Unit today and they have until the 30th may to respond to your request. They are in the process of preparing their reply and they will be issuing this to you shortly.
I understand that you may be having difficulty in relation to progressing your appeal using the procedures that are laid down in policy governing appeal hearings. If you feel that this is the case then you should seek representation from one of the many free organisations that exist such as the Citizens Advice bureau, who should be able to guide you on what to do next.
If I can be of any further assistance to you regarding any of these matters then please feel free, to write or e-mail me again.
yours sincerely Sian Rees Regional Manager.
It funny how that letter is the same date as my e-mail regarding the Pickford letter. But then wotcha expect Crazydave. Well perhaps I picked up on her vibe or her on mine. but then I had this letter from Sian Rees.
date: 25th May 2007 (received 30/5/07)
Dear Mr Gabriel
thank you for your latest e-mail dated the 23rd May received via our customer service e-mail address regarding Mark Pickford's letter of the 18th May.
Prior to writing to you Mark Pickford put all of your e-mails in front of a district chairman to determine whether they could accept them as an application for a statement of reasons. the chairman decided that they were not to be treated as such and Mark Pickford then prepared his response in conjunction with comments from the District Chairman.
If you are unable to follow the directions given in order to obtain a statement of resons then I am afraid that the time allowed to apply for one will elapse and we will then be unable to provide you with this document. I strongly suggest at this stage that you seek advice as per my letter of the 23rd May regarding using the services provided by the Citizens Advice Bureau in order to progress this matter.
the links that you provided us within the context of this e-mail have not been examined as they link to the internet blogs that we have no access to due to web related restrictions in force within the department. But nevertheless if such restrictions were not in place we could not pay heed to information published in the public domain nor respond to any in this format.
Unless you raise any new issues in future correspondence to me then I will be unable to respond on matters which are repetitive in nature and such correspondence will simply be acknowledged and placed on file.
Yours sincerely Sian Rees.
My reply 30/5/07
to Sian Rees n chairman of the Tribunals Service
wed 30/5/07
this is in response to your 23/5/07 n 25/5/07 letters. Pity that my request for correspondence in email form seem to have fallen on deaf ears.
I will not waste time with arguing the toss of your 23/5/07 although when I do post it on my blog I will ask certain questions.
With reference to this 25.5.07
1) are you saying that you are refusing to forward me 'the statement of reasons' because my claim of 'discrimination against mental health sufferes to the boon of mobility' is not sufficient reason under law????
A 19th century attitude in the 21st century it appears.
2) are you saying that while my files are held in a 'court report' I am not entitled to the assistance of a solicitor via the legal aid system. Can you provide details of the name of the court the reports are held within, for my future reference?
3) are you saying that your department are not going to forward the complaint of fraud by Cardiff county Council with respect to its higher than necessary rent levels, and the fiddling of their rent revenue account, which nodoubt alot of your client base have at sometime rented with.
4) are you saying that your going to ignore the complaint regarding the GP on your panel in not reporting to the necessary authorities the allegations of criminal negligence with respect of my health n welfare?
I think the blog will have the title 'TRIBUNAL SERVICE TURN A BLIND EYE TO THE ABUSE OF VULNERABLE ADULTS'
I hope that your next will see the statement of reasons contained within it. I also request that you desist in advising me to go to the CAB if you had read the blogs regarding the water companies, you will note that the CAB failed to uphold my right to privacy regarding the water companies demand that I tell them where I spend the pittance the state provides for the vulnerable to exist on.
That the CAB also failed with respect to the likelyhood of said water company prejudices in not granting the removal of the debt they claim that I owe them, when other wise I meet all requirements to be granted the writing off of that debt. If I listed where I spent that pittance. As far as I am concerned the CAB also aid n abet the water companies in excessively profiting out of houses of multiple occupancy.
Nuff said I look forward with interest to your reply to number 1) of the above. If not the other points raised. Note I have left JP.Walker@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk off the list of co-receivers, but that raises the question of clients being given the fascility of recording all conversations with dept. such of yours in the future so that any missleading information can be proved irrefutably.
David Gabriel NI etc.
WHEN THESE PEOPLE GET EMAILS WITH SUBJECT HEADINGS 'CONFIRMATION REQUEST FOR A STATEMENT OF REASONS' IT MAKES YOU WONDER WHAT YOU DO HAVE TO WRITE TO GET THE BLOODY THING. EH COMMISSIONER DUDES.
END OF UPDATE.
UPDATE TUES 26/6/07
Well here's the latest from Sian Rees letter dated 7/6/07
dear Mr. Gabriel
thank you for your latest e-mail dated the 30th May 2007 regarding recent responses issued to you on the 23rd May and 25th May.
I am sorry you are unhappy that we do not correspond with you by e-mail this is because we have to ensure that your personal information is not disclosed to others via the world wide web.
As you have not raised any new issues that the Tribunal Service is able to answer I have asked for a copy of your e-mail to be put on file and this letter is simply to acknowledge receipt of it.
yours sincerely Sian Rees.
I GUESS ITS TIME CRAZYDAVE TO SEND 'EM ALL THE BLOGS AND TO SIMPLY SAY MRS. REES YOU ARE AIDING N ABETTING THE WELSH ASSEMBLY ET AL IN CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE TO VULNERABLE ADULTS WITH THIS REPLY OF YOURS DATED THE 7/6/07 TO ME.
END OF UPDATE AND PITY AN E-MAIL ADDRESS OF THE
COMMISSIONERS HAS NOT BEEN SUPPLIED JUST THE WEB
ADDRESS MRS REES.
UPDATE 29/6/07
HERE IS A COPY OF THE EMAIL LIST SENT 85 IN ALL.
To
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
aiding n abetting criminal negligence
Jun 26
8KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
for sian rees n the chairperson
Jun 26
60KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
from the bottom up
Jun 26
23KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
number 2
Jun 26
16KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
number 3
Jun 26
14KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
number 4 art thereapy
Jun 26
14KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
number 5 still the abuse continues
Jun 26
34KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
number 6 fascist council
Jun 26
15KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
number 7
Jun 26
43KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
number 8 still she has not responded
Jun 26
12KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
number 9 most excellent sculpture to be
Jun 26
9KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
number 10 house me house me
Jun 26
24KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
number 11 wot social services eh Mr. Beva...
Jun 26
14KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
number 12 people the DLA tribunal prefer ...
Jun 26
21KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
number 13 oh technology no money to buy t...
Jun 26
16KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 14 living with addiction n physical he...
Jun 26
18KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 15 'you are the one you have been wait...
Jun 26
15KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 16 you allready have
Jun 26
19KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 18 as nu 17 was just a repeat of nu 7 ...
Jun 26
13KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 19 social justice bulldoody
Jun 26
10KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 20 free TV for all specially those who...
Jun 26
19KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 21 oh how they love to malign people l...
Jun 26
15KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 22 and so should he be call themselves...
Jun 26
15KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 23 cheap electricity for the vulnerabl...
Jun 26
13KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 24 cheap electricity
Jun 27
15KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 25 of the 484 members contacted not on...
Jun 27
13KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 26 and they wonder why the electorate ...
Jun 27
14KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 27 gross financial missmanagement eh c...
Jun 27
13KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 28 we really do deserve better than th...
Jun 27
11KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 29 there are rules that have continual...
Jun 27
26KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 30 the bbc playing games, not so impar...
Jun 27
30KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 31 when they could have done so much m...
Jun 27
15KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 32 freedom of the press to dupe the el...
Jun 27
21KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 33 and so it is considering their crim...
Jun 27
9KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 34 'everythings a little upside down' ...
Jun 27
13KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 35 maybe if the 57% were allowed this ...
Jun 27
15KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 36 choice? smoking health cannabis bma...
Jun 27
12KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 37 more on the hypocrisy of government
Jun 27
15KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 38 who watches the watchers ???
Jun 27
25KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 39 human rights act 'the right to priv...
Jun 27
26KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 40 the best the countess can do is bur...
Jun 27
38KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 41 and so it is (meanwhile the abusive...
Jun 27
90KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 42 and where is the chairman of the co...
Jun 27
14KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 43 Lord Burns is doing very nicely eh ...
Jun 27
62KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 44 and sue essex had the cheek to say ...
Jun 27
36KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 45 not that any of them got involved d...
Jun 27
13KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 46 the technology is there to do this ...
Jun 28
14KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 47 more on the same theme and don't te...
Jun 28
21KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 48 benefit fraud that the DLA Tribunal...
Jun 28
31KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 49 censorship by the BBC
Jun 28
13KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 50 Mr. Thompson has still failed to re...
Jun 28
57KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 51 another attempt to name n shame the...
Jun 28
123KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 52 oh hum
Jun 28
23KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 53 I STILL CLAIM THE DR. PERJURED HIS ...
Jun 28
48KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 54 theres a storm brewing
Jun 28
23KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 55 chasing up chasing up
Jun 28
36KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 56 totally ignored again eh crazydave
Jun 28
124KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 57 a self portrait art therapy
Jun 28
25KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 58 try try try will you ever know if y...
Jun 28
26KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 59 da ya think I can get a grant for a...
Jun 28
43KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 60 other art works carrying plaster ho...
Jun 28
21KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 61 nuisance neighbours getting away wi...
Jun 28
31KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 62 brainwave syncronisation maybe stro...
Jun 28
29KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 63 portrait of rhodri morgan beheaded
Jun 28
52KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 64 human rights violation in progress ...
Jun 28
65KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 65 social justice what social justice
Jun 28
36KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 66 rodney berman is still getting away...
Jun 28
36KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 67 maybe then we might have some holys...
Jun 28
30KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 68 the CPS a waste of space your Majes...
Jun 28
24KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 69 because the establishment love crea...
Jun 28
22KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 70 your own blog Tribunal dudes
Jun 28
99KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 71 the search for social justice
Jun 28
39KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 72 in their criminal neglignece of vul...
Jun 28
9KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 73 to one of the usual suspects eh Jon...
Jun 29
50KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 74 guess Richard doesn't care about un...
Jun 29
36KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 75 well Lord Goldsmith has gone but fo...
Jun 29
89KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 76 if there had been social justice in...
Jun 29
34KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 77 criminal negligence I think so chie...
Jun 29
18KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 78 way way past time Mr. Thompson, Mr....
Jun 29
10KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 79 not to much to ask of a public serv...
Jun 29
20KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 80 and they call it democracy 'I wanna...
Jun 29
19KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 81 a 1% turn out and its a valid elect...
Jun 29
23KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 82 and mommy won't have to go to jail ...
Jun 29
24KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 83 video evidence! cyber cafes up city...
Jun 29
26KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 84 guess they didn't die for me to be ...
Jun 29
18KB
SSCSA-Cardiff@tribun...
nu 85 Like wots the point duh! another .g...
Jun 29
41KB
86 Message(s)WELL THATS THE LIST THE CRAZYDAVE FILES FROM BOTTOM TO TOP SO NU 85 IS THE PRESS COMPLAINTS COMMISSION BLOG
END OF UPDATE LOVE N LIGHT FROM CRAZYDAVE
UPDATE 13/7/07
HERE'S A COPY OF AN EMAIL SENT 12/7/07 TO THE CHAIRMAN OF THE TRIBUNAL SERVICE MS REES, JONATHAN MORGAN AND MR. MALEKIN.
To the chairman of the DLA Tribunals service Ms Rees etc.,
now that I have completed the sending of the copies of the blogs to you 85 in total for Mr. Malekins reference (see DLA blog). I have been waiting for an acknowledgement of their receipt, by the Tribunals Service.
I know from past experience that Mr. Morgan AM is not in the habit of giving such to his constituents, but who knows he might after this just change his habits.
Its not that your likely to change your determination, unfortunately. But it would be nice to know if being independant of the DHSS your dept is going to call for a public inquiry into criminal negligence of your client group, i.e. mental health sufferes????
yours Crazydave.
I WONDER IF THEY WILL CALL FOR THE PUBLIC INQUIRY???? I WONDER IF THEY ARE GOING TO WRITE N TELL ME THEY HAVE RECEIVED THESE BLOG EMAILS??? BYEFORNOW!
UPDATE 19/7/07
WELL SO FAR NO ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE BLOGS FROM THEM EVEN THOUGH THE LAST WAS SENT ON THE 29/6/07 SO TODAY I HAVE SENT THE FOLLOWING EMAIL.
Hi there chairperson, Ms Rees
below is my latest blog published today 19/7/07, I think it pertainant to my appeal and as the http://www.ossc.gov.uk/ mentioned by you Sian comes up as an invalid address on the council computors. I would once again ask may I have a valid email address for the commissioners who deal with complaints when your dept. is through messing with people.
thankyou in anticipation David Gabriel
Dr. BRIAN GIBBON JUSTICE MINISTER W0T JUSTICE
Thursday, 19 July 2007 (A FULL COPY OF THE BLOG REGARDING Dr. BRAIN GIBBON WAS COPY PASTED TO THE EMAIL) WHY? SO THAT IN THE END THEIR Dr. B.A.HERBERT MIGHT JUST BE ASKED SOME QUESTIONS ON HER FAILURE TO RESPOND TO ABUSE COMPLAINTS, BY CLIENTS OF THE DLA TRIBUNAL SERVICE.
END OF UPDATE.
UDATE 26/7/07
HERE ARE A COUPLE OF EMAILS TO THE COMMISSIONERS OF THE TRIBUNAL SERVICE, F.A.O. COMMISSIONER JACOBS.
HERE IS YESTERDAYS 25/7/07
Hi there commissioner Jacobs
below is a copy paste of a blog placed on http://bbccrazydave.blogspot.com/. recently I have sent 85 seperate blogs to the Tribunal service in Cardiff and have yet to receive confirmation that they have received them, you will probably best have them forward those to you.
You will also note that in the blog I have sent emails regarding you cardiff office playing games with semantics regarding the statement of reasons, something I have still not received.
I can only trust that when I asked today for the name of the Head commissioner that they gave me the right name in giving me yours. The complaint is criminal negligence towards my health n welfare which I believe the Dr. B.A. Hertbert has been party to, as the Panel was asked to be supplied with these blogs prior to my appointment, and the shinanigins they have got up to since. You will find that I have subsequently made a complaint to the GMC (General Medical Coumcil about said Doctor and the health Minister at the Welsh Assembly Dr. Brian Gibbon. I am waiting for their reply.
Here then is the DLA blog placed on blogger, could you tell me if you will hear my appeal regarding my being granted the mobility section of DLA, and ask for a public inquiry on my and other mental health sufferes behalf in view of the information contained in the other blogs.
DLA discrimination against mental health clients
Tuesday, 20 March 2007 (A FULL COPY OF THIS BLOG TO DATE FOLLOWED)
AND HERE IS TODAYS 26/7/07
Hi Commissioner Jacobs
yesterday when I visited the Tribunals service office to find out what the Chief Commissioners name was, I also picked up a copy of the appeal proceedure booklet and today I have read through it.
On page 29 3. reasons to 'set aside' it reads ''if, a document relating to the proceedings was not sent or not received in time'' (well the Cardiff office refused to print off my blogs even though they were asked to as I could not easily afford to.
On page 30 4. Further appeal errors in Law it says ''The tribunal conducted the proceedings in breach of proper procedures''
Well if they refused to get copies of the blogs ergo documents relating to my claim, with the majority of those blogs dealing with initially Wilful Neglect that has with Time become Criminal Negligence, are they party to the Crime so to speak and that in one of the updates in the copy sent you yesterday I mention that of their 'game playing' with semantics aiding n abetting criminal negligence.
I send this today so that you know that I now know what the error in Law they specifically broke plus that discrimination and why this booklet was not sent me I frankly do not know.
all the Best david gabriel aka Crazydave aka Daoud Jibreel.
(JONATHAN MORGAN THE ASSEMBLY MEMBER FOR MY AREA WAS ALSO SENT THIS AT THE SAME TME)
END OF TODAYS UPDATE.
UPDATE 7/8/07
YESTERDAY I sent this to the commissioner again, seeing as they have had emails from me before I guess this lot are just jerking me off, or they are oh so busy they don't have the time to hit reply, to say yes Dave we have received your complaint, these are the email address sent to osscsc@Tribunals.gsi.gov.uk, Jonathan.Morgan@wales.gov.uk, malekin@btconnect.com the last being a local solicitor.
Hi there
I am chasing up a reply to this and the previous email. Could you hit reply and let me know a) the Chief Commissioner is called Jacobs, or whether the cardiff office is jerking me off again. b) So I can have an acknowledgment of the receipt of the complaint below, as its been in your hands for sometime now.
Thank you. David Gabriel
UPDATE 9/8/07
HERE IS THE LATEST FROM THE DLA TRIBUNAL SERVICE REMARKABLE WHAT THESE PEOPLE IN CARDIFF CAN GET AWAY WITH, FUNNY HOW THEY DO NOT EVEN KNOW THE CORRECT NAME OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER SEEING AS HE'S OR IS IT SHE'S A JUDGE. MY REPLY TO IT IS PLACED FIRST.
Hi paul
this is a freedom of information request for the email address of Judge Hickenbottom. It appears to me that you have not looked at the blog details given or you would understand perfectly what the complaint is.
I would suggest that you try again or provide the Judge with the details. Hopefully much sooner than this latest of yours, I believe that the judge will decide that playing games with semantics is unlawful, I believe that the judge will decide that the decision not to set aside made by your cardiff office was illegal. I beleive that the judge will decide that they have infact aided and abetted criminal negligence by the cardiff office.
Thank you David
From: "OSSCSC at Newspaper House" OSSCSC@Tribunals.gsi.gov.uk
To: "david gabriel"
Subject: RE: f.a.o. commissioner JacobsDate: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 14:22:18 ; 9 Aug 2007 13:23:22 -0000
Dear Mr Gabriel,
I am sorry for the delay in replying.
I have checked our office database records and it does not appear that we have any record of your case and it is not completely clear from your e-mail what the matters you raise concern. This office deals with applications and appeals against the decisions of appeal tribunals on points of law. Before this can be done you must first ask the tribunal for a written statement of the tribunal's reasons for its decision, and apply to the tribunal chairman for leave (permission to appeal). This office cannot become involved in this matter until these steps have been taken.
This office has no jurisdiction to investigate any complaints about the Tribunal and you will need to take these matters forward with the tribunal.
Finally the Chief Commissioner is Judge Hickinbottom.
Yours sincerely
Paul Farren
The Commissioners Office
3rd Floor Procession House
55 Ludgate Hill
London
EC4M 7JW
Tele: 020 7029 9850
OH HUM MORE OF THE SAME JERKING ME AROUND JUDGE HICKINBOTTOM IF YOU DON'T MIND ME SAYING SO. THIS IS WHAT I HAD IN MY INBOX TODAY AND THE REPLY I SENT. IT MIGHT BE WORTH NOTING JUDGE THAT MY ASSEMBLY MEMBER WHO HAS RECEIVED THIS AND ALL THE LATEST STUFF STILL HAS NOT BEEN IN CONTACT WITH ANYONE REGARDING THIS LOT BUT THEN THAT NOLONGER SUPRISES ME THAT MAN ONE JONATHAN MORGAN HAS BEEN MALFEASANT IN HIS DEALING WITH ANY EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE THAT I HAVE SENT. HERE THEN IS TODAY STUFF!
Dear Mr Gabriel,
Further to your e-mail I confirm receipt of your request for the e-mail address of the Chief Commissioner. I am currently investigating this and will respond in due course.
I can confirm that I have looked at your e-mail received on 25 July 2007 and that this does not change the contents of my last e-mail to you. Currently there is no further action for us to take in this matter in view of the fact that it does not appear that you have asked the Tribunal Chair for leave to appeal to the Commissioner. Until this is done I repeat that there is no jurisdiction for this office to become involved. I would advise you to speak to the Tribunal directly who will advise you on how to proceed. If you have a particular complaint about the service you have received from the Tribunal you must take this up directly with the Tribunal. This office cannot conduct investigations of this kind.
Yours sincerely
Paul Farren
The Commissioners Office
Tele: 020 7029 9841
Hi Paul
I think that if you read between the lines on the dla blog as part of my http://bbccrazydave.blogspot.com you will find that your cardiff office have been jerking me around for some considerable time. You will also find that I have done my level best to request that they pass the complaint onto your dept but they have refused that, as they have refused to act on the email with the subject heading 'confirmation request for a statement of reasons', still not received by me.
So as far as contacting the Cardiff office once again, you have got to be taking the Michael as well. Ergo aiding n abetting in criminal negligence, I trust that this makes my position in this plain. That they have refused to process the next peice of documentation because the request for it initially didn't conform to the exact wording they require, is for them to explain to the Judge. They knew what the request was for and it was only their bloody mindedness that caused that request for that next piece of documentation not to be processed.
yours David
I TRUST THAT YOU DO SOMETHING ABOUT THE SHINNANAGINS AT YOUR CARDIFF OFFICE JUDGE, I HOPE THAT YOU WILL VIEW THEIR ACTIONS AS AIDING N ABETTING CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE.
UPDATE 15/8/07 WELL THE INFORMATION OFFICE TELL ME THAT THEY ARE DEALING WITH THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST, AND SO IN THE MEANTIME I HAVE SENT THIS EMAIL TODAY SO AS TO PREMPT THE JUDGE TO GET INTOUCH.
ITS SENT TO PAUL FARREN, ANOTHER TO GO ON THE LIST OF CRIMINALLY NEGLIGENT EH JUDGE????????? GIVEN THE NATURE OF THE STUFF ABOVE.
SUBJECT: RE:please forward to the chief connissioner
Hi Paul
I've had the reply from your freedom of information people, and I am emailing today to ask that you forward these emails from me to the judge, with the details of the blog site, so that maybe he can decide of his own volition whether to reply to me in person, even if its under the promise of not to reveal his work email number, although why that is not part of any open government must do, is rather odd.
Thankyou in anticipation
Crazydave.
UPDATE OVER, WHY BOTHER UPDATING 'THE WE'LL GET INTOUCH BY THE MIDDLE OF SEPTEMBER ABOUT IT'.
LATER ON THE SAME DAY I HAD THIS JUDGE FROM BEVERLEY ARE THEY ALL AS DULL AS FUCK JUDGE OR JUST FUCKING WITH ME LIKE YOUR CARDIFF OFFICE.
From: "Aspinall, Beverley" Beverley.Aspinall@tribunals.GSI.GOV.UK
Dear Mr Gabriel
Mr Farren is on annual leave until Monday 20th August, I will ensure I forward your email upon his return.
B.Aspinall
Commissioners' Office
SO I SENT BEV THIS JUDGE I MEAN DOES HER EMAIL MAKE ANY FUCKING SENSE???????WHY THE FUCK IS SHE ANSWERING FARRENS EMAILS ANYWAY????
HI BEV
I DON'T THINK YOU GOT THE DRIFT OF THE EMAIL, THE REQUEST IS FOR THE STUFF TO GO TO JUDGE HICKINBOTTOM, THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER NOT MR. FARREN ASK THE JUDGE TO CHECK OUT http://bbccrazydave.blogspot.com/ most especailly the DLA blog. I trust that this is clearer for you, or were you trying to let me know that Judge Hickinbottom was on holiday, but some how screwed up????????????????????
not that I'm in a rush anymore justice will eventually be done, ps. I suggest you check it out yourself, as your gonna be a star witness as well.
David
OOPS JUDGE I MADE A SPELLING MISTAKE RUCH FOR RUSH, BUT HAVE AMMENDED IT HERE. GUESS YOU MAKE AS MUCH SENSE AS HER EH CRAZYDAVE YEP.
HI JUDGE, TODAY'S UPDATE 20/8/07 AT 2053 HOURS. MY INBOX IS EMPTY I.E. MR. FARREN HAS NOT RESPONDED TO THE EMAIL TO LET ME KNOW THAT HE HAS FORWARDED THE STUFF TO YOU.
I CHECKED THE INTERNET OUT EARLIER TODAY, BUT I COULDN'T FIND OUT ANYTHING ABOUT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS, BUT I DID DISCOVER YOUR FIRST NAMES GARY.
SO TELL ME GARY, WITH ALL THE STUFF ON THE NET REGARDING YOU. HOW IT IS THAT THE 'LETS PLAY GAMES WITH PEOPLE' AT THE CARDIFF OFFICE GOT IT SO WRONG WITH THE JACOBS BULLSHIT???? I MEAN I GAVE THEM AN HOUR TO DISCOVER WHAT IT WAS. OR AT THE END OF ALL THIS ARE YOU GONNA MAKE A JUDGEMENT LIKE THE PARLIAMENTARY OMBUDSMAN IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE 'HARD WORKING' PREJUDICED PEOPLE I'VE HAD THE MISS FORTUNE TO ENCOUNTER AT THE DLA TRIBUNAL OFFICE??????
OR ARE YOU LIKELY TO MAKE A RULING THAT INDEED SOMETHING VERY NAUGHTY HAS BEEN GOING ON HERE, BY PEOPLE WHO OUGHT TO KNOW BETTER??????
I'VE SENT THIS TO THE OFFICE JUDGE
HI THERE
I'VE ADDED THIS BELOW TO THE DLA BLOG ON http://bbccrazydave.blogspot.com/ HOPING THAT SOMEONE SOMEWHERE IN YOU OFFICE WILL HIT REPLY WITH JUDGE GARY HICKINBOTTOM HAS RECEIVED YOUR DETAILS DAVID AND WILL BE INTOUCH SHORTLY.
DAVID GABRIEL (DETAILS OF TODAYS UPDATE ADDED) TO THESE ADDRESSES OSSCSC@Tribunals.gsi.gov.uk, Jonathan.Morgan@wales.gov.uk, malekin@btconnect.com
UPDATE OVER. LOVE N LIGHT HMMMMMMM!!
UPDATE 21/8/07 OH HUM JUDGE HICKINBOTTOM 1711 HRS TIME TO POST THE LATEST EMAIL TO YOUR OFFICE WORKERS.
Hi Judge
tues 21/8/07 1703 hrs no reply do I take it that the London office is now practising atttempting to pervert the course of justice. This is chasing up last weeks email to your mr. Farren and I wonder why it is that the Beverly person if answering other turkey's emails didn't action it as requested of him or were they both having their little bit of fun??????? at my expense, like their Cardiff office co-workers, more protectionism Judge, and what about the Assembly member who has received all this, as far as I am aware he's done jack SxxT, to ask on his constituents behalf 'what do you people think your playing at?'
yours David Gabriel
BECAUSE I WOULD IF HE WERE MINE.
END OF TODAYS UPDATE.
UPDATE FRIDAY 24/8/07 LOOKING FOR JUDGE GARY
Hi Judge Hickinbottom
I guess the request was to much to ask, seems that beverley can reply for someone else in your office on the same day, yet its now friday the 24/8/07 and no, 'yes Mr. gabriel your blog details are with the Judge' I guess it is aiding n abetting criminal negligence after all, or are they going to have the excuse that they were oh so busy busy busy doing other things to forward them to you. Oh and the time Judge 1626 hrs.
Maybe you've had the details forwarded by the Lord Chief Justice because I've gone through that route as well, just so that the abuse of the vulnerable ends ends ends and I have a home where I know peaceful enjoyment.
David Gabriel
AND THE EMAIL TO THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE CRAZYDAVE SHOW THAT AS WELL.
Hi there
I would appreciate the Lord chief justice having a browse through my web page on http://bbccrazydave.blogspot.com/ its just a click away. I have been having some trouble getting hold of an email address for Judge Gary Hickinbottom and wonder if Lord Phillips can be of any assistance with that, forwarding this to Judge Gary might be one way to speed that up, for him to get back to me.
It relates to one of the many complaints made in the blogs most especially with the criminal negligence of myself by seemingly all and sundry, which I am doing my best to put a stop to, and seemingly getting nowhere fast.
Thanks in anticipation
David Gabriel aka Daoud Jibreel aka Crazydave
THAT JUDGE GARY WAS SENT TO THIS EMAIL ADDRESS general.enquiries@judiciary.gsi.gov.uk ON THE 21/8/07 I GUESS I SHOULD HAVE MADE THE REQUEST SPECIFIC TO THIS DLA BLOG BUT I GUESS THAT'S THE NEXT THING COS I HAVENT HAD A ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AS OF THIS MOMENT. I WONDER IF THEY ARE PLAYING THE ASSEMBLY MEMBERS GAME OF NOT REPLYING TO EMAILS, THE OLE MALFEASANCE PLOY.
END OF UPDATE.
UPDATE 30/8/07 BELOW IS THE LATEST EMAIL, A COPY WENT TO THE lORD CHIEF JUSTICE OFFICE WHO LIKE THE DLA PEOPLE ARE A LITTLE SHY OF ACKNOWLEDGING EMAILS.
hi there
the email below was sent on the 24/8/07 its now the thurs 30/8/07 and the same question remains, if Beverley could reply same day to an email for another collegue, how come I am once again sending a chase up, 'can you confirm that judge Gary has my details now' rather than this 'let make the bastard wait' game thats going on here.
ps tell 'em judge 'article 10 of the human rights act is in force' and given everything Mr. Gabriel has brought to your door he deserves better treatment than this.
yours david gabriel
OSSCSC@Tribunals.gsi.gov.uk, Jonathan.Morgan@wales.gov.uk, malekin@btconnect.com, general.enquiries@judiciary.gsi.gov.uk THAT'S the Lord Chief justice office if ya didnee ken.
end of update.
